Online Reporter
President-elect Donald Trump has pledged a 100 percent tariff against BRICS nations if they continue to undermine the US dollar — but the threat won’t rein in the group’s expansion, analysts tell CNBC.
Most recently, Brazil announced Indonesia’s admittance into the bloc as a member last Monday.
Under outgoing President Joe Biden’s administration, Washington has been relatively dismissive of the 10-member coalition, with White House National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby saying during a press briefing last October that the US does not view BRICS — an economic coalition of emerging markets — as a “threat.”
Sentiment could change once Trump enters the White House, following early indications that he may impose tariffs on alliance members if they subvert the US dollar.
“A key policy shift with the incoming Trump administration is its explicit treatment of BRICS as an entity,” Mihaela Papas, director of research at the MIT Centre for International Studies, told CNBC by email.
China will ease the tariff pain
Originally established by Brazil, Russia, India, and China in 2009, then joined by South Africa in 2010, the Beijing-led BRICS was set up as a force to rival Western dominance on the international stage.
The alliance’s 16th annual summit in Kazan saw Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates officially admitted into the group. According to Russian officials and official paper of the Chinese Communist Party’s Central Committee, more than 30 countries have expressed interest in joining the coalition in 2024. CNBC could not independently verify this estimate.
The size of the bloc makes it increasingly unlikely that the US will apply punitive 100 percent tariffs on BRICS countries, according to Duncan Wrigley, chief China+ economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics. Doing so would risk steering nations neutral in the US-China rivalry toward Beijing and interfere with US interests, Wrigley told CNBC by email.
The world’s second-largest economy could even step in to ease the pain of any potential US trade measures against BRICS members, according to David Lubin, senior research fellow at Chatham House.
“From Beijing’s point of view, establishing China as an alternative pillar of global order is a critically important objective and it can’t be met without the support of the developing world,” Lubin said in emailed comments. “And since some 120 countries count China as their main trading partner, this shouldn’t be too difficult.”
China is already starting to do this, putting forward a zero-tariff policy for least developed countries with diplomatic ties with Beijing, which came into effect from December last year and builds on similar measures extended to the least developed African countries.
Dollar is king
Trump’s tariff threat is conditional on BRICS dethroning the US dollar as the world’s most widely used trade currency — which could prove to be a tall order for the alliance. Russia has been pushing for de-dollarization in a bid to sidestep the SWIFT network, a globally recognised standard for bank transactions, and to curtail the impact of US sanctions against Moscow. In the Kazan talks, Vladimir Putin reiterated the use of the dollar as a “weapon” and a “big mistake,” The Guardian reports.
One of the group’s options to topple the dollar was to create a unified BRICS currency — a proposal spearheaded by Brazil, which has yet to gain traction.
Another possibility was setting up multi-currency trade, which is already taking place among several members: some Chinese and Russian trade is being done through the yuan and ruble.
Nations have also agreed to continue to strengthen trading through local currencies and expressed support for the idea of an independent cross-border settlement infrastructure for payments.— CNBC Africa.
Chatham House’s Lubin notes that the Chinese currency is “much less useable internationally than dollars,” given that financial markets are largely denominated in the greenback.
Just a ‘talking shop’
The lack of a concrete allied strategy and action from BRICS members raises doubts over whether it will be considered a threat to the US, with Pantheon Macroeconomics’ Wrigley saying the emerging markets alliance is currently not much more than a “talking shop.”
The bloc is still too loose and unorganised to create any substantive change, with the 2024 Kazan summit resulting in “nothing really concrete”, according to Cecilia Malmström, nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
This might just insulate BRICS members and partner countries from a trade war with the US — which has China as one of its main targets.
While Beijing holds a significant position in the group, there is still much internal caution amongst other member nations over Beijing’s dominance and potential trade imbalances, according to MIT’s Papas.
“Even if China seeks to leverage its position, internal caution among members is likely to remain a limiting factor,” she adds.
Many BRICS members also still maintain their friendly relations with the US as a “crucial trade partner,” Gustavo Medeiros, head of research at Ashmore Group told CNBC by email.
“There is no reason to believe members of the bloc would be automatically at economic or geopolitical risk in the case of a trade war between the US and China,” Medeiros says — CNBC Africa.
